so a friend today asked me what his deal is and i honestly don't know.
i saw someone post about his accusations that the doj is investigating watchtower and people seemed down on the guy, as well has johnny the bethelite or whatever his name is that claims to leak stuff.
i don't know rick fearon, don't watch his show, but his site just seems a little crazy, and he seems to get into occult conspiracies and the jws, which never lends credibility.. so for those of you who have been around a while, what's the deal?
@StephaneLaliberte
Morph has it really out for him, like a serious personal vendetta, I guess he wants the JW Survey people to be publicly executed like in biblical times or serve lifetime prison sentences ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ idk, when you find out, let me know.
sorry guys,.
the gorby satire fake report of the annual meeting with the coincidence about russia, is used for real in john cedars yt channel.. please concider it for well prepared satire.. and not much more.. g..
@TheTruthBR
Im not denying that Cedars and his JW survey team messed up big time but we got an apology from Redwood. You sound like you want the guys at JW survey to be executed for a capital punishment, dude it’s not that serious, sounds like you could use a joint
sorry guys,.
the gorby satire fake report of the annual meeting with the coincidence about russia, is used for real in john cedars yt channel.. please concider it for well prepared satire.. and not much more.. g..
You know what it is Morph, nowadays the Society has changed so many things, so to introduce a new arrangement like “Circuit elder” even though it’s satire, people can believe it. Let’s say the person who reported it to Redwood never came back to see Gorby say it was satire. I get it not everyone is a genius like you Morph, but that doesn’t make everyone an idiot/moron. Mellow out, smoke a cigar or have a beer or something
sorry guys,.
the gorby satire fake report of the annual meeting with the coincidence about russia, is used for real in john cedars yt channel.. please concider it for well prepared satire.. and not much more.. g..
@_Morpheus
Name calling already? I’m not blaming Gorby, but I guess if I voice my opinion then I’m a moron
sorry guys,.
the gorby satire fake report of the annual meeting with the coincidence about russia, is used for real in john cedars yt channel.. please concider it for well prepared satire.. and not much more.. g..
it was announced in this year’s annual meeting that they believe that the king of the north is russia and the king of the south is us/britain.
for me this is the first time hearing from the society actually identifying the identity of the king of the north.
very interesting times!
It was announced in this year’s annual meeting that they believe that the King of the North is Russia and the king of the south is US/Britain. What do you think of this? For me this is the first time hearing from the Society actually identifying the identity of the King of the North. Very interesting times! I am curious to hear what you guys think. Please share your thoughts.
-Jules
i had a family relative use this scripture found here to justify shunning.
the scripture reads as followed.
if, now, your right eye is making you stumble, tear it out and throw it away from you.+for it is better for you to lose one of your members than for your whole body to be pitched into ge·henʹna.
I had a family relative use this scripture found here to justify shunning. The scripture reads as followed
If, now, your right eye is making you stumble, tear it out and throw it away from you.+For it is better for you to lose one of your members than for your whole body to be pitched into Ge·henʹna.*+ 30 Also, if your right hand is making you stumble, cut it off and throw it away from you.+For it is better for you to lose one of your members than for your whole body to land in Ge·henʹna.
Now my personal opinion is that at first glance it looks like it is something that Jesus said that justifies shunning but if you read back to a couple verses before 29 and 30 you will find that Jesus is speaking of adultery and the scriptures read:
You heard that it was said: ‘You must not commit adultery.’+ 28 But I say to you that everyone who keeps on looking at a woman+ so as to have a passion for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
Correct me if I’m wrong but using this in the context of shunning is incorrect. I interpret the scripture as being more anti masturbation as opposed to being pro shunning to having your right eye and right hand removed if you look at woman with lust.
I think it’s one of those scriptures that are misapplied by Witnesses to be pro shunning when taken out of context. It’s annoying that they do that
for ex jws, pimos, pomos, faders, born again christians, agnostics, atheists, etc.
what is your opinion regarding sex before marriage, has your view been influenced since you left?
in western society, you’ll probably find yourself ridiculed to be an 18 year old virgin so i am curious to hear opinions from here.
For ex JWs, PIMOs, POMOs, faders, born again Christians, agnostics, atheists, etc. what is your opinion regarding sex before marriage, has your view been influenced since you left? In Western society, you’ll probably find yourself ridiculed to be an 18 year old virgin so I am curious to hear opinions from here
i asked this question to a relative after mentioning several situations where teachings were changed or readjusted (new light) and they have two reasons.
yes, they are correct because look at how the preaching work has grown through the decades and the advancements in witnessing and the second reason was the doctrine of the trinity and how the society opposes that.
i didn’t really have a response, especially for the trinity doctrine.. does the governing body have the rejection of the trinity belief correct?.
In regards to the point of the preaching work growing or having success I was going to point to the growth the witnesses have had in recent years in comparison to decades ago and also how the preaching work is still under ban in several countries. The trinity issue is a hard one to comment on
i asked this question to a relative after mentioning several situations where teachings were changed or readjusted (new light) and they have two reasons.
yes, they are correct because look at how the preaching work has grown through the decades and the advancements in witnessing and the second reason was the doctrine of the trinity and how the society opposes that.
i didn’t really have a response, especially for the trinity doctrine.. does the governing body have the rejection of the trinity belief correct?.
I asked this question to a relative after mentioning several situations where teachings were changed or readjusted (new light) and they have two reasons. Yes, they are correct because look at how the preaching work has grown through the decades and the advancements in witnessing and the second reason was the doctrine of the trinity and how the Society opposes that. I didn’t really have a response, especially for the trinity doctrine.
Does the Governing Body have the rejection of the trinity belief correct?
~Jules
